Tutorials of Visual Graphic Communication Programs for Interior Design

Reviewed by Matt Andring, Assistant Professor, Johnson County Community College on 6/3/22

Comprehensiveness rating: 5 see less

Pretty thorough textbook for an introductory CAD course. Maybe not suitable for an advanced, production drafting course, but very suitable for its purpose. I found the images and links helpful.

Content Accuracy rating: 5

I found the content accurate. I did not see anything presented in a way that was not accurate. The software covered will continue to be revised so eventually the book content may need updating.

Relevance/Longevity rating: 5

The Autodesk software is revised on a two year cycle. Some content will need to be revised to keep up with these updates. This is a minor thing. Even when Autodesk updates, the old features / old command pathway is usually still available.

Clarity rating: 5

Organized well, and straight and to the point; just the way a book about software should be.

Consistency rating: 5

The book is consistent in text and organization. I didnt detect in change in text pattern or approach that would make it a problem from chapter to chapter or from software to software.

Modularity rating: 5

Nice concise chapters. One could choose to progress through in order or jump to sections / chapters for specific commands if desired.

Organization/Structure/Flow rating: 5

Clear and logical. Book includes good introductions followed by commands and menu content that flow nicely.

Interface rating: 5

I found the book easy to navigate. I downloaded the e-book. There are quite a few hyperlinks that make navigation easier. The hyperlinks that I tried worked. Image resolution is pretty good.

Grammatical Errors rating: 5

Most of the text is about navigating software commands. The way the command text itself is distinguished from normal sentence text is important. Same with menu options. I found it all to be very easy to read with no glaring grammar problems.

Cultural Relevance rating: 5

No cultural bias detected. It is a software book.

Comments

I teach a CAD for Interior Design course and I plan to use portions of this textbook next semester

Reviewed by Laura Kimball, Assistant Professor, Radford University on 3/18/22

Comprehensiveness rating: 5 see less

The text is very comprehensive and systematic in approach for learning or refreshing with the software. The text offers images, video tutorial links, helpful shortcuts.

Content Accuracy rating: 5

This tutorial textbook is thorough, accurate and un biased in approach.

Relevance/Longevity rating: 4

The current content is accurate and relevant, concerns have to do with continual updates in software will make the current text less accurate posing the question: will there be future editions? Updates may be easy depending on the software provider changes which are out of the author's hands.

Clarity rating: 5

This text features a clean, concise format with the structure in a very systematic approach.

Consistency rating: 5

Even from program to program the tutorials are consistent and concise.

Modularity rating: 5

The text offers well sectioned and easily understandable formatting.

Organization/Structure/Flow rating: 5

This textbook is systematic in approach, the structure is logical and concise.

Interface rating: 4

The interface includes a few images are dark and a little challenging to see with out zooming in; however that is the nature of the software images.

Grammatical Errors rating: 5

Grammatically this was easy to read with no glaring errors.

Cultural Relevance rating: 5

It is culturally un biased.

Comments

I am excited to share this textbook with my students.

Reviewed by Dina Al-Dajani, Assistant Professor, Massasoit Community College on 5/24/21

Comprehensiveness rating: 5 see less

The contents of the book reflect the book structure clearly. I think the author has succeeded in meeting the objectives and learning approaches of the book through presenting illustrations that support the tutorials of learning three software in one book. In addition, using the commands shortcuts and explaining their meaning are very helpful for learners.

Content Accuracy rating: 5

Content cite is up to date.

Relevance/Longevity rating: 5

Content is up-to-date; however, with design software there is always new from Autodesk which I think can be easily applied. I would recommend adding Lynda.com to the references list which might be a good resource to be added.

Clarity rating: 4

Ideas were clearly organized following a logical and consistent order. However, I would recommend adding a caption underneath or beside each image or figure. These captions explain and elaborate on these illustrations, so learners know what the idea of the image or what command was applied.

Consistency rating: 5

Ideas were clearly organized following a logical and consistent order which makes it easy to follow and navigate through.

Modularity rating: 5

I like the way the author simplified tutorials by dividing each tutorial into steps that anyone can easily follow and apply. For example, creating a legend for the RCP plan in CAD could be completed in 3 steps. These steps were detailed and illustrated graphically and by texts.

Organization/Structure/Flow rating: 5

Ideas were clearly organized following a logical and consistent order which makes it easy to follow and navigate through.

Interface rating: 4

I would recommend adding a caption underneath or beside each image or figure. These captions explain and elaborate on these illustrations, so learners know what the idea of the image or what command was applied.

Grammatical Errors rating: 5

Looks good overall.

Cultural Relevance rating: 5

I think the way graphics and illustrative integrated with the texts was successful and support diverse student’s learning styles.

Comments

The author performed well in advising users to check their PC requirements before installing these software’s; however, I think it would be great for the users to mention what version of AutoCAD or Sketch up or Revit has been used in this learning tutorials.