Skip to content

    Applied Fluid Mechanics Lab Manual

    Reviewed by Isaac Choutapalli, Professor, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley on 11/20/20

    Comprehensiveness rating: 4

    The text covers most basic areas in experimental fluid mechanics.

    Content Accuracy rating: 4

    The content is error free. However, many figures in the textbook do not show clarity and are sometimes confusing with too much detail in small spaces.

    Relevance/Longevity rating: 4

    The text covers many important basic fluid mechanics related experiments that are very important in undergraduate fluid mechanics. However, most experiments use basic equipment and the authors did not make any attempt to introduce basic advanced measurement techniques like PIV. There are quite a few PIV systems specially designed for undergraduate education.

    Clarity rating: 3

    The authors are sufficiently clear in their explanations and presentation of the material. However, the instruction with regard to operating the equipment is missing. While it is difficult to put out a specific set of 'general' instructions for operating the equipment, the authors could have used the equipment available in their laboratory and could have written down the operating instructions for that specific equipment. That would provide a general sense of how similar instruments could be operated and how the data could be collected.

    Consistency rating: 4

    The lab manual is, in general, consistent within the framework of basic fluid mechanics experiments for undergraduates.

    Modularity rating: 4

    The text is well divided into compact modules which are complete experiments in themselves.

    Organization/Structure/Flow rating: 4

    The topics are presented in a logical fashion in increasing order of difficulty and follows the general pattern of many standard fluid mechanics textbooks.

    Interface rating: 4

    Some of the images in the lab manual are too 'congested'. There are too many details that are fit into a small space. One suggestion is to split up the figures into multiple sub figures.

    Grammatical Errors rating: 4

    The lab manual reads well and is mostly free of grammatical errors.

    Cultural Relevance rating: 4

    This reviewer did not find anything in the lab manual that is culturally insensitive.

    Back