Skip to content

    Human Anatomy: Self-Assessment Review Questions

    Reviewed by Jorge Canchola, Lecturer III, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley on 12/12/24

    Comprehensiveness rating: 3

    The textbook comprehensively covers all major body regions, including the back and spine, upper and lower limbs, thoracic wall, pleura and lungs, mediastinum, abdomen, pelvis and perineum, head and face, mouth and pharynx, neck and larynx, orbit, eye, and ear. While some sections contain more questions than others, the textbook includes a table of contents but lacks an index or glossary. Adding new questions, an index, and a glossary would enhance the text's comprehensiveness.

    Content Accuracy rating: 5

    The content is accurate and unbiased.

    Relevance/Longevity rating: 3

    Factual knowledge of anatomy remains relatively stable over time, allowing for straightforward updates to its structure. However, without incorporating diverse question types or interactive elements, the text risks becoming outdated more quickly. Users might only engage with it once before seeking more comprehensive self-assessment tools.

    Clarity rating: 3

    The text is written in clear anatomical language, and the questions are straightforward. To enhance clarity for students, consider adding explanations with the answers.

    Consistency rating: 5

    The textbook maintains consistency in terminology and framework throughout.

    Modularity rating: 3

    The textbook is well-structured into sections, each with clearly organized questions. However, its effectiveness as a study tool is hindered by the need to constantly flip between the modules and the answer key. An online version could address this issue by incorporating a feature where answers are revealed under the question after one or more attempts. This would enhance students' self-assessment.

    Organization/Structure/Flow rating: 3

    Topics are presented in a logical and clear manner. The book could be enhanced by organizing questions by difficulty level or categorizing them according to Bloom's taxonomy. Additionally, placing the answer key after each section, rather than at the end of the book, would improve usability.

    Interface rating: 3

    The text is free from significant interface issues. Addition of images and charts would enhance the questions and make it a better review source, enhancing the self-assessment experience without causing confusion. The text is only available in PDF and hardcopy. It would be a good update to provide it as an online text to improve navigation.

    Grammatical Errors rating: 5

    The textbook is free from grammatical errors, the content and language are easy to read.

    Cultural Relevance rating: 4

    Because of the nature of the text, I don't see an issue with its lack of cultural sensitivity and inclusivity. Perhaps in the future if clinical cases are added, using examples that reflect a variety of races, ethnicities, and backgrounds would be appropriate.

    Comments

    Overall, this textbook is a valuable resource for students studying human anatomy. It is clear and well-organization making it a good self-assessment source for both instructors and learners. Because of limited questions and lack of an online version, the text may become outdated rather quickly.

    Back