Comprehensiveness rating: 5 read less
While the book contains neither an index nor a glossary, this is not much of an impediment in a book that is so clearly organized. The book is a series of essays written by twenty-four different authors, and each essay is clearly titled, so it's not hard to navigate through the book in order to find the essays that are of greatest interest to the individual reader. Moreover, the book absolutely covers all areas and ideas of the subject appropriately. If you're interested in the complexities of composing and revising programs in professional and technical writing, this book will have something for you, no matter your institutional context or where you're at in the process of program development.
Accuracy rating: 5
The book is definitely error-free; I was impressed by the copyediting and fact checking. As for whether or not the content is accurate and unbiased, that's a little harder to say because the book's editors are very open about the fact that, in gathering the essays that comprise the book, they "emphasized that [they] were looking for case studies in first person that revealed how designers made sense of and organized their particular location." In other words, the essays contained in this book are subjective. In my opinion, this is a strength of the book, rather than a weakness. It's exciting to read about such a diversity of experiences; this diversity almost guarantees that the reader will be able to relate to at least some of the essays, no matter the reader's institutional context. Also, the first-person narratives make this book a much more enjoyable read than your standard academic prose.
Relevance/Longevity rating: 5
This book was published in 2010, but if it weren't for being asked to comment in this review on the book's relevance/longevity, I wouldn't have even noticed that the book is already seven years old. In other words, it feels very up-to-date; the concerns it addresses are still the concerns of those who are developing professional and technical writing programs today.
Clarity rating: 5
In the book's preface, David Franke writes that he emphasized to prospective authors that the book's editors "were looking for case studies in first person that revealed how designers made sense of and organized their particular location." The first-person narratives make this book a much more enjoyable read than your standard academic prose. The text is written in lucid, accessible prose, and any jargon/technical terminology that has been used is appropriately contextualized.
Consistency rating: 4
Terminology and framework vary across the different essays, as you would expect in a book with twenty-four different authors. However, the book's editors experimented with peer review: "Alex Reid and I wrote responses to each essay we accepted and mailed our comments back to the author. Simultaneously, each essay was mailed to another contributor in the book for further response and comments." This little experiment means that there is perhaps greater consistency than is found in similar collections of essays (though the book's editors only rarely inserted cross-references between chapters, which might have been a nice addition). Overall, I was impressed by how well the book worked as a whole, not just as a collection of parts.
Modularity rating: 5
This book is a collection of essays by twenty-four different authors, so it's readily divisible into smaller reading sections. However, I have a hard time imagining it being used as part of a course. I think it's a great book for administrators of professional and technical writing programs, but I don't think the audience goes much beyond this. It's not that the book is too difficult for students; it's that the subject matter is perhaps too particular to be used in any but a very small number of very specific, advanced courses.
Organization/Structure/Flow rating: 4
The sixteen essays in this book are arranged in five sections. Of these five sections, four of them are well conceived and represent a logical progression. In the middle, however, is a section titled "Minors, Certificates, Engineering." Even the title of this section represents a strange mixture of things. It's not that the essays in this section aren't important or valuable; on the contrary, there are some particularly excellent essays in this section. However, the organization of this section within the larger structure of the book is... well, strange.
Interface rating: 5
The book contains no significant interface issues. There are no display features that would distract or confuse the reader. The tables that have been included are well chosen and well designed.
Grammatical Errors rating: 5
The text contains no significant grammatical errors. It's remarkably well copyedited for an academic book with a presumably small market.
Cultural Relevance rating: 5
The text is not culturally insensitive or offensive in any way. Jude Edminster and Andrew Mara's essay, “Reinventing Audience through Distance,” makes a particularly valuable contribution to the book by drawing on Thomas Kent and post-colonialist theory in its discussion of professional and technical writing.